Find AI Prompts
HomeHuman ResourcesPhone Screen Guides
Human ResourcesRecruiting

AI Prompts for Phone Screen Guides

A phone screen has one job: decide, on evidence, whether it is worth both sides investing in a full interview loop. It does that by testing the must-haves that a resume cannot show, checking the practical fit (compensation, location, timing, motivation) early enough to avoid wasted loops, and giving the candidate an honest picture of the role. It is not a mini-interview and not a sales call.

These prompts build the guide, prepare the candidate-facing side, and structure the scoring and the next-step rule. The same evidence discipline as the screening rubric applies, and the same guardrail: the screener decides, on job-related evidence, and records why.

Before you use these

Have these ready to replace the highlighted [variables]:

These prompts structure evidence against stated, job-related criteria and draft documents. They do not make hiring decisions. Do not ask the model to rank, reject or recommend candidates on protected characteristics or their proxies (name, address, school, gaps, age indicators), and do not treat its output as a decision: a person accountable for the hire reviews every score and makes the call. Check local law before using any automated or AI-assisted screening.

The prompts

1. Build the phone screen guide

Best forA twenty-minute guide that tests what the resume cannot show and checks practical fit early.
Inputs needed
  • Must-haves
  • Practical fit factors
  • Role realities
How to use itGive the must-haves and the fit factors. The model writes a timed guide with one question per must-have, probes, and the honest role description.
Expected outputTimed guide: opening, role reality (2 minutes), one question per must-have with probes and what good evidence sounds like, practical fit questions, candidate questions, close and next steps.
Act as a recruiter designing a [minutes]-minute phone screen guide for [role].

Must-haves and evidence: [from intake]
Practical fit: [compensation range, location/working model, start date, level, travel]
Role realities candidates often misjudge: [list]

Build the guide with timings:
1. Opening (1 min): purpose of the call, structure, that it is a two-way check.
2. Role reality (2 min): the honest description including the parts people find hard; then 'does that match what you expected?'
3. Must-have questions (one per must-have, with two probes each): open, past-behavior or work-sample based ('tell me about a time you…', 'walk me through how you…'); what strong, acceptable and weak evidence sounds like for each.
4. Practical fit (3 min): compensation expectations against the range (stated openly), location/working model, notice period, other processes — asked plainly.
5. Motivation (2 min): why this move, why now — without leading.
6. Candidate questions and close: what happens next and when.
7. Questions not to ask (personal circumstances, protected characteristics, anything not job-related) — as a reminder on the guide.

2. Write the candidate-facing agenda and expectation-setting

Best forThe invitation and the opening that make the screen fair, transparent and worth the candidate's time.
Inputs needed
  • Guide
  • Process overview
  • Tone
How to use itThe model writes the scheduling message with the agenda, what to prepare, and the process ahead — plus the spoken opening.
Expected outputInvitation message with agenda and preparation, the spoken opening, the honest role paragraph, and the close that states the next-step timeline.
You are writing the candidate-facing side of a phone screen for [role] at [company].

Guide: [structure and timing]
Process ahead: [stages, typical timeline]
Tone: [company voice]

1. Invitation message (under 150 words): purpose, duration, who they will speak to, what will be covered (in plain terms — must-haves, the role, practical questions), what to have in mind, and how to reschedule.
2. Spoken opening (30 seconds): sets the two-way frame, mentions that compensation and practicalities will be discussed openly, invites questions at any point.
3. Honest role paragraph to say aloud: what the role is, what is hard about it, what is good about it — no selling adjectives.
4. Close (30 seconds): what happens next, when they will hear either way, and who to contact.
5. Follow-up message after the screen (both outcomes): advance (next step, date), not advancing (decision in the first two sentences, thanks specifically, honest door).
6. Accessibility: the line offering adjustments or an alternative format.

Keep everything plain and truthful. Candidates decide too.

3. Score the screen and apply the next-step rule

Best forConsistent scoring with recorded evidence and a clear rule for who advances.
Inputs needed
  • Guide
  • Screener notes
  • Advance criteria
How to use itPaste the notes from a screen. The model extracts evidence per must-have, scores against the anchors, checks practical fit, and applies the rule — with the decision left to the screener.
Expected outputEvidence-per-criterion record with scores, practical-fit result, the rule outcome (advance / hold / pass) as a recommendation for the screener, and the note to the hiring manager.
Act as a recruiting analyst scoring a phone screen for [role].

Guide and anchors: [must-haves with strong/acceptable/weak evidence]
Advance rule: [e.g. all must-haves at acceptable or better and practical fit confirmed; holds for one weak must-have with strong others]
Screener notes: [paste — what the candidate said per question, practical fit answers]

1. For each must-have: the evidence quoted from the notes, the score against the anchors, and any gap where the question was not asked or the answer was not probed.
2. Practical fit: confirmed / mismatch / unknown for each factor, with the note.
3. Rule outcome as a recommendation (advance / hold / pass) with the reason — to be confirmed by the screener.
4. Consistency check: anything in the notes that is not job-related and should not influence the score (personal circumstances, communication style unrelated to the role, assumptions about the candidate).
5. Note to the hiring manager (under 100 words): evidence highlights, open questions for the interview loop, practical constraints.
6. Feedback to the candidate if not advancing: one specific, honest, job-related point.

The screener decides. Present the outcome as a recommendation with evidence, never as a verdict.

Related prompts

Logical next step

After this, most HR teams move on to Resume Screening Rubrics.

Get the free HR & Recruiting AI Starter Kit → Nine of these prompts as an intake → assess → offer hiring workflow with an intake worksheet, delivered by email. See what's inside

All Human Resources prompts · Search the full library